Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage with long-term lumen-apposing metal stent indwell: 1-year results from a prospective nationwide observational study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: This study aimed to determine safety and risk factors for adverse events (AEs) of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) with long-term indwell of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS). METHODS: This study is a multicenter prospective observational study on consecutive high surgical-risk patients requiring gallbladder drainage who underwent EUS-GBD with LAMS over 12 months. Centralized telephone follow-up interviews were conducted every 3 months for 1 year. Patients were censored at LAMS removal, cholecystectomy, or death. AE-free survival was determined using log-rank tests. Cumulative risks were estimated using life-table analysis. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients were included (53.7% male, median [interquartile range] age of 84.6 [76.5-89.8] years, and 85.4% with acute cholecystitis). Technical success was achieved in 79 (96.3%), and clinical success in 73 (89%). No patient was lost to follow-up; 45 patients (54.9%) completed 1-year follow-up with in situ LAMS. Median (interquartile range) LAMS indwell time was 364 (47-367) days. Overall, 12 (14.6%) patients presented 14 AEs, including 5 (6.1%) recurrent biliary events (3 acute cholangitis, 1 mild acute pancreatitis, and 1 acute cholecystitis). Patients with pancreatobiliary malignancy had an increased risk of recurrent biliary events (33% vs 1.5%, P = 0.001). The overall 1-year cumulative risk of recurrent biliary events was 9.7% (4.1-21.8%). The 1-year risk of AEs and of severe AEs was 18.8% (11-31.2%) and 7.9% (3.3-18.2%), respectively. Pancreatobiliary malignancy was the single risk factor for recurrent biliary events; LAMS misdeployment was the strongest risk factor for AEs. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term LAMS indwell does not increase the risk of delayed AEs following EUS-GBD.

Endoscopic treatment (endoscopic balloon dilation/self-expandable metal stent) vs surgical resection for the treatment of de novo stenosis in Crohn's disease (ENDOCIR study): an open-label, multicentre, randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Stenosis is one of the most common complications in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). Endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) is the treatment of choice for a short stenosis adjacent to the anastomosis from previous surgery. Self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) may be a suitable treatment option for longer stenoses. To date, however, there is no scientific evidence as to whether endoscopic (EBD/SEMS) or surgical treatment is the best approach for de novo or primary stenoses that are less than 10 cm in length. METHODS/DESIGN: Exploratory study as "proof-of-concept", multicentre, open-label, randomized trial of the treatment of de novo stenosis in the CD; endoscopic treatment (EBD/SEMS) vs surgical resection (SR). The type of endoscopic treatment will initially be with EDB; if a therapeutic failure occurs, then a SEMS will be placed. We estimate 2 years of recruitment and 1 year of follow-up for the assessment of quality of life, costs, complications, and clinical recurrence. After the end of the study, patients will be followed up for 3 years to re-evaluate the variables over the long term. Forty patients with de novo stenosis in CD will be recruited from 15 hospitals in Spain and will be randomly assigned to the endoscopic or surgical treatment groups. The primary aim will be the evaluation of the patient quality of life at 1 year follow-up (% of patients with an increase of 30 points in the 32-item Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ-32). The secondary aim will be evaluation of the clinical recurrence rate, complications, and costs of both treatments at 1-year follow-up. DISCUSSION: The ENDOCIR trial has been designed to determine whether an endoscopic or surgical approach is therapeutically superior in the treatment of de novo stenosis in CD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04330846. Registered on 1 April 1 2020. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/home.

Endoscopic removal of lumen-apposing metal stents - risk factors for stent embedment, complex removals, and adverse events: analysis from a multicenter prospective case series.

BACKGROUND: Removing lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) may be difficult and even harmful, but these features have seldom been analyzed. We aimed to generate a comprehensive assessment of the feasibility and safety of LAMS retrieval procedures. METHODS: A prospective multicenter case series including all technically successfully deployed LAMSs between January 2019 and January 2020 that underwent endoscopic stent removal. All retrieval-related data were prospectively recorded using standardized telephone questionnaires as part of centralized follow-up that ended after stent removal had been performed. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed the potential risk factors for complex removal. RESULTS: For the 407 LAMSs included, removal was attempted in 158 (38.8 %) after an indwell time of 46.5 days (interquartile range [IQR] 31-70). The median (IQR) removal time was 2 (1-4) minutes. Removal was labelled as complex in 13 procedures (8.2 %), although advanced endoscopic maneuvers were required in only two (1.3 %). Complex removal risk factors were stent embedment (relative risk [RR] 5.84, 95 %CI 2.14-15.89; P = 0.001), over-the-wire deployment (RR 4.66, 95 %CI 1.60-13.56; P = 0.01), and longer indwell times (RR 1.14, 95 %CI 1.03-1.27; P = 0.01). Partial and complete embedment were observed in 14 (8.9 %) and five cases (3.2 %), respectively. The embedment rate during the first 6 weeks was 3.1 % (2/65), reaching 15.9 % (10/63) during the following 6 weeks (P = 0.02). The adverse event rate was 5.1 %, including seven gastrointestinal bleeds (5 mild, 2 moderate). CONCLUSIONS: LAMS removal is a safe procedure, mostly requiring basic endoscopic techniques attainable in conventional endoscopy rooms. Referral to advanced endoscopy units should be considered for stents with known embedment or long indwell times, which may require more technically demanding procedures.

Caustic Ingestion: A Risk-Based Algorithm.

INTRODUCTION: Caustic ingestion management could be improved with a diagnostic approach based on risk factors. This study aimed to develop an algorithm derived from predictive factors of a poor clinical course, to evaluate its diagnostic accuracy and resource consumption, and to compare it with 2 other approaches, a radiological one based on computed tomography and a classical one based on symptoms and endoscopy. METHODS: All patients older than 15 years presenting with caustic ingestion in our tertiary care hospital between 1995 and 2021 were prospectively included. Adverse outcome was defined as intensive care unit admission, emergency surgery, or death. Ingestion characteristics, symptoms, and laboratory and endoscopic findings were analyzed to determine the most relevant risk factors. Diagnostic accuracy and the number of examinations required were estimated and compared with the other 2 algorithms applied to our series. RESULTS: The sample included 532 cases of caustic ingestion, 13.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.3-16.0) of which had adverse outcomes. Volume and type of caustic substance; presence of symptoms and pharyngolaryngeal involvement; and neutrophilia, acidosis, and endoscopic injury were combined to develop an algorithm that would provide the highest diagnostic odds ratio (167.2; 95% CI: 71.9-388.7). Following this approach, half of the patients (50.6%; 95% CI: 46.2-55.1) would not require any examination and, overall, the need for endoscopy (20.0%; 95% CI: 16.4-23.5) and computed tomography (16.3%; 95% CI: 13.0-19.5) would be lower than that for the other 2 algorithms. DISCUSSION: A risk-based algorithm could improve caustic ingestion management by maintaining high diagnostic accuracy while reducing diagnostic test requirements.

Documento de posicionamiento. Recomendaciones del grupo español de trabajo en enfermedad de Crohn y colitis ulcerosa (GETECCU) sobre el tratamiento de la estenosis en la enfermedad de Crohn / Position Statement. Recommendations of the Spanish Group on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis (GETECCU) on the treatment of strictures in Crohn's disease

A pesar de los avances farmacológicos, la estenosis en la Enfermedad de Crohn (EC) sigue siendo un problema importante que obliga en un alto porcentaje de pacientes a realizar tratamientos endoscópicos y/o quirúrgicos. No existen en la actualidad índices clínicos o herramientas diagnósticas que nos permitan predecir qué pacientes desarrollarán esta complicación, y actualmente cuando una estenosis se diagnostica, suele estar ya bien establecida y clínicamente relevante. El papel actual del tratamiento farmacológico se limita a tratar la inflamación y una vez que existe una fibrosis importante, las únicas opciones terapéuticas son las endoscópicas y/o quirúrgicas. Para poder establecer un correcto algoritmo terapéutico y con base en la evidencia científica disponible en este momento, el grupo Español de Trabajo en Enfermedad de Crohn y Colitis Ulcerosa (GETECCU) ha decidido realizar este documento de posicionamiento sobre el tratamiento de la estenosis en la EC. Este documento abarca los tres abordajes terapéuticos mencionados, médico, endoscópico y quirúrgico. Se establecen recomendaciones y algoritmos terapéuticos que nos permitan ayudar a elegir la opción más adecuada en función de las características de la estenosis y del paciente.(AU)

Despite pharmacological advances, strictures in Crohn's disease (CD) continues to be an important problem that leads in a high percentage of patients to undergo endoscopic and/or surgical treatments. There are currently no clinical scores or diagnostic tools that allow predicting which patients will develop this complication, and when a stricture is diagnosed, it is usually already well established and clinically relevant. The current role of pharmacological treatment is limited to treat inflammation and once there is significant fibrosis, the only therapeutic options are endoscopic and/or surgical. To establish a correct therapeutic algorithm and based on the current scientific evidence available, the Spanish Group Working on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis (GETECCU) has decided to conduct this position statement on the treatment of strictures in CD. This document embraces the three mentioned therapeutic approaches, medical, endoscopic and surgical. Recommendations and therapeutic algorithms are established to help us to choose the most appropriate option based on the characteristics of the stricture and the patient.(AU)

Multicenter study of lumen-apposing metal stents with or without pigtail in endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage for malignant obstruction-BAMPI TRIAL: an open-label, randomized controlled trial protocol.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether the insertion of an axis-orienting double-pigtail plastic stent (DPS) through biliary lumen-apposing meal stent (LAMS) in EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy (CDS) improves the stent patency. The aim of this study is to determine whether this technical variant offers a clinical benefit in EUS-guided biliary drainage (BD) for the management of distal malignant biliary obstruction. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a multicenter open-label, randomized controlled trial with two parallel groups. Eighty-four patients with malignant biliary obstruction will undergo EUS-BD (CDS type) using LAMS in 7 tertiary hospitals in Spain and will be randomized to the LAMS and LAMS plus DPS groups. The primary endpoint is the rate of recurrent biliary obstruction, as a stent dysfunction parameter, detected during follow-up. Secondary endpoints: technical and clinical success (reduction in bilirubin > 50% within 14 days of stent placement), safety, and others (number of reinterventions, time to biliary obstruction, prognostic factors, survival rate). DISCUSSION: The BAMPI trial has been designed to determine whether the addition of a coaxial axis-orienting DPS through LAMS is superior to LAMS alone to prevent stent dysfunction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04595058 . Registered on October 14, 2020.

Self-expandable metal stents versus endoscopic balloon dilation for the treatment of strictures in Crohn's disease (ProtDilat study): an open-label, multicentre, randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) is the established endoscopic treatment for short strictures in Crohn's disease. Fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMS) have been used for endoscopic treatment of patients for whom EBD was unsuccessful. We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of the two endoscopic treatments in patients with Crohn's disease with stenosis and compare the mean cost of both treatments. METHODS: This multicentre, open-label, randomised trial was done in 19 tertiary and secondary hospitals in Spain. Patients with Crohn's disease with obstructive symptoms and predominantly fibrotic strictures of less than 10 cm in length were eligible for inclusion. We excluded patients with stenosis treated with SEMS or EBD in the previous year and stenosis not accessible to a colonoscope. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either EBD (EBD group) or FCSEMS (FCSEMS group) using a digital en-block randomisation system (block size of four). In the EBD group, dilation was done with a CRE Boston Scientific (Marlborough, MA, USA) pneumatic balloon with the diameter set at the discretion of the endoscopist; a maximum of two sessions of dilation were allowed with a minimum interval of 15-30 days between them. In the FCSEMS group, a 20 mm diameter Taewoong (Gimpo-si, South Korea) fully covered metal stent was placed; stent length was set at the discretion of the endoscopist. The primary outcome was to assess the efficacy of the endoscopic treatment, defined by the proportion of patients free of a new therapeutic intervention (EBD, FCSEMS, or surgery) due to symptomatic recurrence at 1 year of follow-up. Patients were analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Adverse events were recorded for all the patients; events were considered associated to be with the procedure when a causal association was possible, probable, or definite. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02395354. FINDINGS: From Aug 28, 2013, to Oct 9, 2017, we assessed the eligibility of 99 patients, of whom 19 (19%) patients were excluded. Thus, 80 (81%) patients were randomly assigned to treatment: 39 (49%) patients to the FCSEMS group and 41 (51%) patients to the EBD group. 33 (80%) of 41 patients in the EBD group and 20 (51%) of 39 patients in the FCSEMS group were free of a new therapeutic intervention at 1 year (odds ratio [OR] 3·9 [95% CI 1·4-10·6]; p=0·0061). Two (3%) of 80 patients had severe adverse events (one [2%] patient in the EBD group and one [3%] patient in the FCSEMS group); both patients had perforations. INTERPRETATION: EBD is more effective than FCSEMS for Crohn's disease strictures, with a good safety profile for both treatments. FUNDING: Spanish National Institute of Health, Foundation of Spanish Society of Digestive Endoscopy, Catalan Society of Gastroenterology, and Taweoong.

Position Statement. Recommendations of the Spanish Group on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis (GETECCU) on the treatment of strictures in Crohn's disease. / Documento de posicionamiento. Recomendaciones del grupo español de trabajo en enfermedad de Crohn y colitis ulcerosa (GETECCU) sobre el tratamiento de la estenosis en la enfermedad de Crohn.

Despite pharmacological advances, strictures in Crohn's disease (CD) continues to be an important problem that leads in a high percentage of patients to undergo endoscopic and/or surgical treatments. There are currently no clinical scores or diagnostic tools that allow predicting which patients will develop this complication, and when a stricture is diagnosed, it is usually already well established and clinically relevant. The current role of pharmacological treatment is limited to treat inflammation and once there is significant fibrosis, the only therapeutic options are endoscopic and/or surgical. To establish a correct therapeutic algorithm and based on the current scientific evidence available, the Spanish Group Working on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis (GETECCU) has decided to conduct this position statement on the treatment of strictures in CD. This document embraces the three mentioned therapeutic approaches, medical, endoscopic and surgical. Recommendations and therapeutic algorithms are established to help us to choose the most appropriate option based on the characteristics of the stricture and the patient.

Botulinum Toxin Injection Plus Topical Diltiazem for Chronic Anal Fissure: A Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial and Long-term Outcome.

BACKGROUND: Chemical sphincterotomy avoids the risk of permanent incontinence in the treatment of chronic anal fissure, but it does not reach the efficacy of surgery and recurrence is high. Drug combination has been proposed to overcome these drawbacks. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the clinical, morphological, and functional effects of combined therapy with botulinum toxin injection and topical diltiazem in chronic anal fissure and to assess the long-term outcome after healing. DESIGN: This is a randomized, controlled, double-blind, 2-arm, parallel-group trial with a long-term follow-up. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a tertiary care center. PATIENTS: A total of 70 consecutive patients were referred to the gastroenterology department of a hospital in Valencia, Spain. INTERVENTION: After botulinum toxin injection (20 IU), patients were randomly assigned to local diltiazem (diltiazem group) or placebo gel (placebo group) for 12 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was fissure healing (evaluated by video register by 3 independent physicians). Secondary outcomes included symptomatic relief (30-day diary), effect on anal sphincters (manometry), safety, and long-term recurrence (24 months and 10 years). RESULTS: Healing was achieved per protocol in 13 of 25 (52%) patients of the diltiazem group and 11 of 30 (36.7%) patients of the placebo group (p = 0.25); on an intention-to-treat basis in 37.1% and 31.4% (p = 0.61). Both groups displayed significant reduction of anal pressures. Thirty percent reported minor and transitory incontinence, without differences between groups. Nine (69.2%) of the diltiazem group and 6 (54.5%) of the placebo group experienced a relapse at 24 months (p = 0.67). The overall recurrence rate at 10 years was 83.3% (20/24 patients). LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by the loss of patients during the trial. The low healing rate led to a small cohort to assess recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Combined botulinum toxin injection and topical diltiazem is not superior to botulinum toxin injection in the treatment of chronic anal fissure. Both options offer suboptimal healing rates. Long-term recurrence is high (>80% at 10 years) and might appear at any time after healing. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B527. INYECCIN DE TOXINA BOTULNICA MS DILTIAZEM TPICO EN FISURA ANAL CRNICA UN ENSAYO CLNICO ALEATORIZADO DOBLE CIEGO Y RESULTADOS A LARGO PLAZO: ANTECEDENTES:La esfinterotomía química evita el riesgo de incontinencia permanente en el tratamiento de la fisura anal crónica, pero no alcanza la eficacia de la cirugía y la recurrencia es alta. Se ha propuesto la combinación de fármacos para superar estos inconvenientes.OBJETIVO:Comparar los efectos clínicos, morfológicos y funcionales de la terapia combinada con inyección de toxina botulínica y diltiazem tópico en fisura anal crónica y evaluar el resultado a largo plazo después de la cicatrización.DISEÑO:Ensayo aleatorizado, controlado, doble ciego, de dos brazos, de grupos paralelos con un seguimiento a largo plazo.ESCENARIO:Estudio realizado en un centro de atención terciaria.PACIENTES:Un total de 70 pacientes consecutivos referidos al servicio de gastroenterología de un hospital de Valencia, España.INTERVENCIÓN:Después de la inyección de toxina botulínica (20UI), los pacientes fueron asignados al azar a diltiazem local (grupo de diltiazem) o gel de placebo (grupo de placebo) durante 12 semanas.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado primario fue la cicatrización de la fisura (evaluado por registro de video por tres médicos independientes). Los resultados secundarios incluyeron alivio sintomático (diario de 30 días), efecto sobre los esfínteres anales (manometría), seguridad y recurrencia a largo plazo (24 meses y 10 años).RESULTADOS:La curación se logró por protocolo en 13/25 (52%) en el grupo de Diltiazem y 11/30 (36,7%) en el grupo de Placebo (p = 0.25); por intención de tratar en el 37.1% y el 31.4%, respectivamente (p = 0.61). Ambos grupos mostraron una reducción significativa de las presiones anales. El 30% refirió incontinencia leve y transitoria, sin diferencias entre grupos. 9 (69.2%) del grupo de Diltiazem y 6 (54.5%) del grupo de placebo recurrieron a los 24 meses (p = 0.67). La tasa global de recurrencia a los 10 años fue del 83.3% (20/24 pacientes).LIMITACIONES:La pérdida de pacientes a lo largo del ensayo. La baja tasa de curación llevó a una pequeña cohorte para evaluar la recurrencia.CONCLUSIONES:La inyección combinada de toxina botulínica y diltiazem tópico no es superior a la inyección de TB en el tratamiento de la fisura anal crónica. Ambas opciones ofrecen tasas de curación subóptimas. La recurrencia a largo plazo es alta (> 80% a los 10 años) y puede aparecer en cualquier momento después de la curación. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B527.

Tratamiento quirúrgico de neoplasia mucinosa papilar intraductal de la vía biliar diagnosticada mediante SpyGlass(R) / No disponible

Presentamos el caso de un varón de 76 años con antecedente de colecistitis aguda intervenido mediante colecistectomía laparoscópica. Intraoperatoriamente, se evidenció una colecistitis crónica con conducto cístico engrosado. La anatomía patológica informó de displasia de alto grado que afectaba al borde distal del cístico. Ante los hallazgos, se practicó colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica (CPRE) con SpyGlass(R) con la cual se observó, adyacente a la unión del cístico-colédoco, lesión excrecente sugestiva de malignidad. Se decidió nueva intervención quirúrgica y se realizó una resección de vía biliar extrahepática con linfadenectomía del hilio hepático y hepaticoyeyunostomía. El informe anatomopatológico definitivo informó de neoplasia mucinosa papilar intraductal pancreatobiliar con displasia de alto grado con márgenes libres

No disponible

Surgical treatment of an intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the biliary tract diagnosed by SpyGlass®.

We present the case of a 76-year-old male with a history of acute cholecystitis who underwent a scheduled laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Chronic cholecystitis with a thickened cystic duct was observed intraoperatively. The anatomic pathology report found high-grade dysplasia that affected the distal edge of the cystic duct. In view of these findings, an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was performed with SpyGlass® and an excrescent lesion suggestive of malignancy adjacent to the cystic-common bile duct junction was observed. A resection of the extrahepatic bile duct was performed with lymphadenectomy of the hepatic hilum and hepaticojejunostomy in a subsequent procedure. The definitive pathology report confirmed pancreaticobiliary intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia with high-grade dysplasia and free margins.

Neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced unresectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: oncological outcomes at a single academic centre.

INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic cancer (PC), even in the absence of metastatic disease, has a dismal prognosis. One-third of them are borderline resectable (BRPC) or locally advanced unresectable PC (LAUPC) at diagnosis. There are limited prospective data supporting the best approach on these tumours. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (ChT) is being increasingly used in this setting. METHODS: This is a retrospective series of consecutive patients staged as BRPC or LAUPC after discussion in the multidisciplinary board (MDB) at an academic centre. All received neoadjuvant ChT, followed by chemoradiation (ChRT) in some cases, and those achieving enough downstaging had a curative-intent surgery. Descriptive data about patient's characteristics, neoadjuvant treatments, toxicities, curative resections, postoperative complications, pathology reports and adjuvant treatment were collected. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival was calculated with Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. RESULTS: Between August 2011 and July 2019, 49 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, and all of them received neoadjuvant ChT. Fluorouracil+folinic acid, irinotecan and oxaliplatin was the most frequently used scheme (77%). The most prevalent grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia (26.5%), neurotoxicity (12.2%), diarrhoea (8.2%) and nausea (8.2%). 18 patients (36.7%) received ChRT thereafter. In total, 22 patients (44,9%) became potentially resectable and 19 of them had an R0 or R1 pancreatic resection. One was found to be unresectable at surgery and two refused surgery. A vascular resection was required in 7 (35%). No postoperative deaths were observed. Postoperative ChT was given to 12 (66.7%) of resected patients. Median OS of the whole cohort was 24,9 months (95% CI 14.1 to 35.7), with 30.6 months for resected and 13.1 months for non-resected patients, respectively (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: A neoadjuvant approach in BRPC and LAUPC was well tolerated and allowed a curative resection in 38.8% of them with a potential improvement on OS.

A rare case of acute cholangitis after endoscopic ampullectomy

No disponible

A rare case of acute cholangitis after endoscopic ampullectomy.

Endoscopic ampullectomy is indicated for the resection of non-invasive papillary adenomas in selected patients. Cholangitis is an uncommon complication (0-2%) that may be secondary to contamination during the procedure, poor emptying of the bile duct and prosthesis dysfunction or migration. Placement of a prophylactic biliary stent after the resection is not well established. We present a rare case of acute cholangitis after endoscopic ampullectomy secondary to a biliary prosthesis obstruction, due to a pancreatic prosthesis intrusion.

Correction to: Efficacy and safety of endoscopic balloon dilation in inflammatory bowel disease: results of the large multicenter study of the ENEIDA registry.

Javier P. Gisbert was listed incorrectly as Javier Pérez-Gisbert.

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic balloon dilation in inflammatory bowel disease: results of the large multicenter study of the ENEIDA registry.

BACKGROUND: There is no information regarding the outcome of Crohn's disease (CD) patients treated with endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) in non-referral hospitals, nor on the efficacy of EBD in ulcerative colitis (UC). We report herein the results of the largest series published to date. AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of EBD for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) stenosis performed in 19 hospitals with different levels of complexity and to determine factors related to therapeutic success. METHODS: We identified IBD patients undergoing EBD in the ENEIDA database. Efficacy of EBD was compared between CD and UC and between secondary and tertiary hospitals. Predictive factors of therapeutic success were assessed with multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Four-hundred dilations (41.2% anastomotic) were performed in 187 IBD patients (13 UC/Indeterminate colitis). Technical and therapeutic success per dilation was achieved in 79.5% and 55.3%, respectively. Therapeutic success per patient was achieved in 78.1% of cases (median follow-up: 40 months) with 49.7% requiring more than one dilation. No differences related to either diagnosis or hospital complexity was found. Technical success [OR 4.12 (95%CI 2.4-7.1)] and not receiving anti-TNF at the time of dilation [OR 1.7 (95% CI 1.1-2.6)] were independently related to therapeutic success per dilation. A stricture length ≤ 2 cm [HR 2.43 (95% CI 1.11-5.31)] was a predictive factor of long-term success per patient. The rate of major complications was 1.3%. CONCLUSIONS: EBD can be performed with similar efficacy and safety in hospitals with differing levels of complexity and it might be a suitable treatment for UC with short stenosis. To achieve a technical success and the short length of the stenosis seem to be critical for long-term therapeutic success.

Self-expanding metallic stent as a bridge to surgery in the treatment of left colon cancer obstruction: Cost-benefit analysis and oncologic results. / Stents metálicos autoexpandibles como puente a la cirugía en el tratamiento del cáncer de colon izquierdo en oclusión. Análisis coste-beneficio y resultados oncológicos.

INTRODUCTION: The use of a self-expanding metallic stent as a bridge to surgery in acute malignant left colonic obstruction has been suggested as an alternative treatment to emergency surgery. The aim of the present study was to compare the morbi-mortality, cost-benefit and long-term oncological outcomes of both therapeutic options. METHODS: This is a prospective, comparative, controlled, non-randomized study (2005-2010) performed in a specialized unit. The study included 82 patients with left colon cancer obstruction treated by stent as a bridge to surgery (n=27) or emergency surgery (n=55) operated with local curative intention. The main outcome measures (postoperative morbi-mortaliy, cost-benefit, stoma rate and long-term oncological outcomes) were compared based on an "intention-to-treat" analysis. RESULTS: There were no significant statistical differences between the two groups in terms of preoperative data and tumor characteristics. The technically successful stenting rate was 88.9% (11.1% perforation during stent placement) and clinical success was 81.4%. No difference was observed in postoperative morbi-mortality rates. The primary anastomosis rate was higher in the bridge to surgery group compared to the emergency surgery group (77.8% vs. 56.4%; P=.05). The mean costs in the emergency surgery group resulted to be €1,391.9 more expensive per patient than in the bridge to surgery group. There was no significant statistical difference in oncological long-term outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The use of self-expanding metalllic stents as a bridge to surgery is a safe option in the urgent treatment of obstructive left colon cancer, with similar short and long-term results compared to direct surgery, inferior mean costs and a higher rate of primary anastomosis.

Stents metálicos autoexpandibles como puente a la cirugía en el tratamiento del cáncer de colon izquierdo en oclusion. Analisis coste-beneficio y resultados oncológicos / Self-expanding metallic stent as a bridge to surgery in the treatment of left colon cancer obstruction: Cost-benefit analysis and oncologic results

INTRODUCCIÓN: El uso de un stent metálico autoexpandible como puente a la cirugía del cáncer de colon izquierdo en oclusión se ha señalado como tratamiento alternativo a la cirugía de urgencia. El objetivo del presente estudio fue comparar la morbimortalidad, el coste-beneficio y los resultados oncológicos a largo plazo de ambas opciones terapéuticas. MÉTODOS: Se trata de un estudio prospectivo, comparativo, controlado y no aleatorizado (2005-2010) realizado en una unidad especializada. El estudio agrupó a 82 pacientes con cáncer de colon izquierdo en oclusión tratados mediante stent como puente a la cirugía (n = 27) o cirugía de urgencia (n = 55), intervenidos con intención curativa local. Las principales variables del estudio (morbimortalidad postoperatoria, coste-beneficio, tasa de estomas y resultados oncológicos a largo plazo) fueron comparados sobre la base de un análisis «con intención de tratar». RESULTADOS: No se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los dos grupos en términos de datos preoperatorios y características tumorales. La tasa de éxito técnico en la colocación de la endoprótesis fue del 88,9% (con un 11,1% de perforaciones derivadas del stent), y el éxito clínico fue del 81,4%. No se observó diferencia alguna en cuanto a los índices de morbimortalidad postoperatoria. La tasa de anastomosis primaria fue superior en el grupo «stent como puente a la cirugía», en comparación al grupo «cirugía de urgencia» (77,8% frente a 56,4%; p = 0,05). Los costes medios por paciente en el grupo «cirugía de urgencia» resultaron ser más elevados (+ 1.391,9 Euros) que en el grupo «stent como puente a la cirugía». No se produjeron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en cuanto a resultados oncológicos a largo plazo. CONCLUSIONES: El uso de stents metálicos autoexpandibles como puente a la cirugía constituye una opción segura para el tratamiento urgente del cáncer de colon izquierdo en oclusión, con resultados oncológicos similares a largo plazo en comparación a la cirugía de urgencia, con menor coste económico y una tasa superior de anastomosis primarias, evitando numerosos estomas

INTRODUCTION: The use of a self-expanding metallic stent as a bridge to surgery in acute malignant left colonic obstruction has been suggested as an alternative treatment to emergency surgery. The aim of the present study was to compare the morbi-mortality, cost-benefit and long-term oncological outcomes of both therapeutic options. METHODS: This is a prospective, comparative, controlled, non-randomized study (2005-2010) performed in a specialized unit. The study included 82 patients with left colon cancer obstruction treated by stent as a bridge to surgery (n=27) or emergency surgery (n=55) operated with local curative intention. The main outcome measures (postoperative morbi-mortaliy, cost-benefit, stoma rate and long-term oncological outcomes) were compared based on an "intention-to-treat" analysis. RESULTS: There were no significant statistical differences between the two groups in terms of preoperative data and tumor characteristics. The technically successful stenting rate was 88.9% (11.1% perforation during stent placement) and clinical success was 81.4%. No difference was observed in postoperative morbi-mortality rates. The primary anastomosis rate was higher in the bridge to surgery group compared to the emergency surgery group (77.8% vs. 56.4%; P=.05). The mean costs in the emergency surgery group resulted to be Euros 1,391.9 more expensive per patient than in the bridge to surgery group. There was no significant statistical difference in oncological long-term outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The use of self-expanding metalllic stents as a bridge to surgery is a safe option in the urgent treatment of obstructive left colon cancer, with similar short and long-term results compared to direct surgery, inferior mean costs and a higher rate of primary anastomosis